I have two SQL queries, where the first one is:
select Activity, SUM(Amount) as "Total Amount 2009"
from Activities, Incomes
where Activities.UnitName = ? AND
Incomes.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID
GROUP BY Activity
ORDER BY Activity;
and the second one is:
select Activity, SUM(Amount) as "Total Amount 2008"
from Activities, Incomes2008
where Activities.UnitName = ? AND
Incomes2008.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID
GROUP BY Activity
ORDER BY Activity;
(Dont mind the '?', they represent a parameter in birt). What i want to achieve is the following: I want an SQL query that returns the same as the first query, but with an additional (third) column which looks exactly like "Total Amount 2008" (from the 2nd query).
-
Try this:
select Activity, SUM(Incomes.Amount) as "Total Amount 2009", SUM(Incomes2008.Amount) as "Total Amount 2008" from Activities, Incomes, Incomes2008 where Activities.UnitName = ? AND Incomes.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID AND Incomes2008.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID GROUP BY Activity ORDER BY Activity;Basically you have to JOIN Incomes2008 table with the output of your first query.
Kjetil Watnedal : Because you have used inner joins, the result will not contain rows with no income in 2008 or no income in 2009 (ie not having a row in the income table)Shivasubramanian A : Guess I was in a hurry to post... Shd work now...Schildmeijer : My initial attempt looked something like this. didnt work though -
SELECT Activity, arat.Amount "Total Amount 2008", abull.Amount AS "Total Amount 2009" FROM Activities a LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT ActivityId, SUM(Amount) AS Amount FROM Incomes ibull GROUP BY ibull.ActivityId ) abull ON abull.ActivityId = a.ActivityID LEFT OUTER JOIN ( SELECT ActivityId, SUM(Amount) AS Amount FROM Incomes2008 irat GROUP BY irat.ActivityId ) arat ON arat.ActivityId = a.ActivityID WHERE a.UnitName = ? ORDER BY ActivitySchildmeijer : The statement compiles but the computed sums are way to largeQuassnoi : Sorry, didn't get what you want on the first time. See updated post. -
I would just use a Union
In your second query add the extra column name and add a
''in all the corresponding locations in the other queriesExample
//reverse order to get the column names select top 10 personId, '' from Telephone//No Column name assigned Union select top 10 personId, loanId from loan -
If you assume that values exist for all activities in both years then just do an inner join as follows
select act.activity, t1.amount as "Total 2009", t2.amount as "Total 2008" from Activities as act, (select activityid, SUM(Amount) as amount from Activities, Incomes where Activities.UnitName = ? AND Incomes.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID GROUP BY Activityid) as t1, (select activityid, SUM(Amount) as amount from Activities, Incomes2008 where Activities.UnitName = ? AND Incomes2008.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID GROUP BY Activityid) as t2 WHERE t1.activityid= t2.activityid AND act.activityId = t1.activityId ORDER BY act.activityIf you can't assume this, then look at doing an outer join
Il-Bhima : Sorry there may have been an extra semicolon running around. -
perhaps not the most elegant way to solve this
select Activity, SUM(Amount) as "Total_Amount", 2009 AS INCOME_YEAR from Activities, Incomes where Activities.UnitName = ? AND Incomes.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID GROUP BY Activity ORDER BY Activity; UNION select Activity, SUM(Amount) as "Total_Amount", 2008 AS INCOME_YEAR from Activities, Incomes2008 where Activities.UnitName = ? AND Incomes2008.ActivityId = Activities.ActivityID GROUP BY Activity ORDER BY Activity; -
Some DBMSs support the
FROM (SELECT ...) AS alias_namesyntax.Think of your two original queries as temporary tables. You can query them like so:
SELECT t1.Activity, t1."Total Amount 2009", t2."Total Amount 2008" FROM (query1) as t1, (query2) as t2 WHERE t1.Activity = t2.ActivitySchildmeijer : the problem is though, that if one activity is zero, that activity will not be displayed. possbile to fix that with this elegant solution?Natrium : if the Activity were (null) instead of 0, it would be a piece of cake with a left outer join. But in this case it is rather difficult I'm afraid...Liam : Maybe you could union this query with a special case for a zero on the left and one for a zero on the right.
0 comments:
Post a Comment